NEWS CENTER – On the subject of nuclear weapons that have been used, the following paragraph deserves special mention. Because even if we can assume that through the nuclear weapons depot at the Incirlik Air Force Base in Turkey, which houses American nuclear weapons such as the B61 and is operated by Turkish soldiers, the fascist regime will in principle have access to nuclear weapons within the framework of NATO’s nuclear participation it seems rather unlikely that the occupying Turkish soldiers would use these weapons against the guerrillas.
PKK Executive Council member Duran Kalkan and Murat Karayilan have raised the issue publicly several times, making it clear that the tactical nuclear weapons being used are on a much smaller scale than, for example, the B-61. A large number of times it was mentioned in the HPG the probability that the B-61.
However, there are other forms of tactical nuclear weapons that were being researched by NATO countries during the Cold War for use against the socialist bloc if the worst came to the worst, by special forces trained and trained for that purpose alone. This tactical nuclear weapon is called “Atomic Demolition Munitions” or ADM for short, and the images of this weapon bear a striking resemblance to the images of the Turkish occupation soldiers planting high-intensity explosives in the guerrilla resistance tunnels.
3.2 POISON GAS AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS
3.2.2 PULMONARY AGENTS – GREEN CROSS – GREEN CROSS
3.2.3 YELLOW CROSS MUSTART – YELLOW CROSS – SKIN COMBATANT
MUSTARD GAS- LOST
3.2.4 BLOOD WARFARE AGENT
HYDROGEN CYANIDE – HYDROCYANIC ACID
3.2.5 PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS
3.2.6 OCULAR WARFARE AGENTS – WHITE CROSS/DRINKING GAS
3.4.3 ATOMIC DEMOLITION MUNITIONS (ADM)
Duran Kalkan stated in a special broadcast on TV channel Medya Haber, which was published in German by our news agency on July 17, 2022:
“I give information about tactical nuclear weapons. A third of NATO’s nuclear weapons inventory are tactical nuclear weapons. They are that important. This weapon is used in tunnels and mountain valleys by the guerrillas. They are made for use in these places. War is already being waged in such places. Basically, these weapons are carried in bags and backpacks. That’s so. They are fired from rifles or small ramps. You have such a clear mark. Another thing is that detonating a 4.5 kg bomb has the same effect as detonating a 20-ton explosive. She radiates such energy. Both the sound and the effect are similar. With 4.5 kg bombs produced the effect of 20 tons of bombs.
The guerrillas gave information, it was bombed with such explosives. This is not a C4 or TNT. Because planes drop tons of bombs there. No, they drop 4-ton shells at once. Then it makes no sense to detonate 5-10 kg of explosives. There is no such logic.
There are doubts about these explosions. There are dozens of types of these tactical nuclear weapons. Unlike chemical weapons, there are no such types. When they explode, they use up all the oxygen at that moment. For this reason, the nervous system of all living beings divides. It burns and destroys some. There are tactical nuclear weapons that have different characteristics. They use the ones that destroy oxygen, that burn and drive people crazy. We also did research. The comrades who came out of the Girê Sor War Tunnels in Avaşîn said the following: “The last time there was such an explosion, we said that the earth shook, it was not like the previous ones. We were in a closed place, we stayed for a while and then left. We saw, that our hevals had fallen on the ground. We came to the door, the soldiers weren’t there, we went out.” It is clear that they attacked with nuclear weapons, they moved away so as not to be influenced. It is certain that this is not a chemical weapon, it is not another explosive, when the research is completed it will turn out to be a tactical nuclear weapon. We can say that very clearly. Otherwise this should come out.” that it is a tactical nuclear weapon. We can say that very clearly. Otherwise this should come out.” that it is a tactical nuclear weapon. We can say that very clearly. Otherwise this should come out.”
Duran Kalkan spoke of nuclear weapons that can be transported in bags or backpacks, the so-called “suitcase bombs” from Atomic Demolition Munitions.
On August 20, 2022, the news channel ANF also published footage showing how Turkish occupying soldiers placed mine devices at the entrances to the Şehid Hêjar wartime tunnels in the Girê Hakkarî resistance area and blew them up a short time later after they had left. The guerrillas emphasized that the mines were tactical nuclear bombs. Comparing the images with images of the MK-54 SADM’s H-912 transport container reveals a striking resemblance.
Atomic Demolition Munitions are tactical nuclear weapons, also known as atomic mines, nuclear mines or nuclear land mines. The nuclear explosives are placed at a specific location, like a mine, and detonated by remote control or by a timer.
There are three different sizes of this weapon. ADM are bombs with an explosive force of 10 tons. Small ADM or SADM have an explosive force of up to 1 kt and Medium ADM or MADM designates the version with an explosive force of 500 t to 15 kt.
There have been attempts to produce a nuclear weapon that can be carried along by the soldiers in the smallest possible form as a rucksack or bag (suitcase bomb) and can therefore be attached flexibly to the place of action.
For example, ” Blue Peacock” is a code name of a nuclear weapons project by the British Ministry of Defense during the Cold War in the 1950s and falls under the ADM. The project was top secret and was only published in 2002 by the British historian Dawid Hawkings. The aim was to be able to stop and destroy the opposing Warsaw Pact troops in the event of an invasion of West Germany. Allied troops received small-scale nuclear weapons such as B. the “Davy Crockett”to prevent a possible occupation. With the principle of “scorched earth”, nuclear land mines should be placed at important strategic points such as industrial plants, train stations and dams. The project is said to have been ended by the British Ministry of Defense in 1958.
The Davy-Crockett warhead weighs only 23 kilograms and is a US-made nuclear warhead that can also be used as a backpack version called the MK-54 SADM. Developed in the 1950s, the egg-shaped weapon was only 27 cm in diameter and 40 cm long. Their yield was about 0.02 KT TNT.
Allied special units were trained to carry out attacks with these weapons in the event of an occupation at the border to the Soviet Union and also in the Soviet Union. Mission scenarios were also played out, in which the soldiers jumped out of the plane with nuclear mines on their backs and fled by parachute. The problem with the weapon was that, despite the massive reduction in size, it continued to cause problems for the soldiers when transporting the weapon, which made it difficult to use it inconspicuously.
In 1985, 93 units would have been operational in Europe if there had been an uproar due to an attack by Warsaw Pact troops. But there are also sources that speak of 300 pieces. Since the forces of the Warsaw Pact were superior to the opposing forces, NATO felt free to use such weapons to stop the enemy. The exact areas of application are kept secret to this day.
After there were psychological problems with the use of these weapons, especially in the German military, and the Ministry of Defense also campaigned against the use of so-called nuclear mines in 1969 and the threat scenario from the Warsaw Pact had disappeared with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the ADM lost its importance.
In 1994, the United States Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act, which prevented the government from developing nuclear weapons with a yield of less than 5 KT, but it was repealed in 2004.
NOT PROHIBITED, RESTRICTED
Because of the enormous destructive power of nuclear weapons, there have always been efforts to abolish and ban all nuclear weapons, but the power interests of individual nations prevented a rapid abandonment of these weapons of mass destruction. Nevertheless, some agreements were enforced that restricted the spread and development of these weapons. However, it is doubted how effective these contracts really are.
In October 1963, the “Test Ban Agreement” came into force, in which it was agreed that nuclear weapons would no longer be used in water, in space or in the atmosphere. The tests under the ground were restricted in that they were not allowed to exceed a certain explosive force. A total of 120 nations have joined this agreement.
The subsequent nuclear non-proliferation treaty of July 1968 came into effect in 1970 and was initiated and signed by the USA, Great Britain, France and China and the Soviet Union. In total, the treaty was addressed to 191 countries, with four states not having signed the treaty to date, including India, Israel, Pakistan and South Sudan. North Korea withdrew from the treaty in January 2003 and its final status has so far been left open.
The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT for short) deals with the prohibition of the proliferation and the obligation to disarm nuclear weapons, as well as the “peaceful use” of nuclear energy
With this, the states undertake to be controlled by the International Atomic Energy Agency and to comply with the treaty. There is also an article in the treaty that provides for negotiations “in the near future” to guarantee “complete disarmament”.
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) has been open for signature since 1996, but has not yet come into force due to a number of key countries opposed to arms controls, such as B. The United States.
In addition, there were bilateral agreements between the USA and the former Soviet Union and today Russia to advance the disarmament of strategic nuclear weapons. These include the SALT I and II talks (from 1969-1979) that led to the 1972 ABM treaty, the 1987 INF treaty and the 1991 and 1993 START I and II treaties, and the 2002 SORT treaty .
Apart from the lack of bans and the lack of political assertiveness in relation to the hegemonic powers, nuclear weapons have been internationally banned weapons since Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the latest and are the subject of social criticism. However, societal efforts to take serious action against these weapon systems have weakened over the years.
